[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gdb 4.17.19981224-1.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat (source i386) to ~vincent



I've just uploaded a new upstream version of gdb on
master.debian.org/~vincent/.
I've had to re-apply all of the patches that there previously applied to
the Debian version (except the 'threads' patch which should be back soon).
I'd like anyone using gdb a lot to test it and tell me if it works
correctly. (As usual, I'm very interested by reports from people using
non-i386 machines).

Another thing: this version of gdb is supposed to be able to support many
languages, but I have no test program in fortran, ada & modula2. So if you
have small programs (ie: just doing a little more than the classic
HelloWorld programs), I'd be interested to have a copy.

	Cordialement,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 01:30:38 +0100
Source: gdb
Binary: gdb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.17.19981224-1.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Vincent Renardias <vincent@waw.com>
Description: 
 gdb        - The GNU Debugger
Changes: 
 gdb (4.17.19981224-1.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Upgrade to new code.
   * Re-apply the gazillions patches which are refused upstream.
   * Many features may not work anymore, please test!
Files: 
 838099c9e06d3fc4abb5c207a6687d23 700 devel standard gdb_4.17.19981224-1.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat.dsc
 d9b0cb0a366ac75dc318024723e8d399 1167773 devel standard gdb_4.17.19981224-1.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat.diff.gz
 bc3e6f88c527e8356e94ec0a09fa6fc5 1028176 devel standard gdb_4.17.19981224-1.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNp66iQ+bo1sI1mwpAQFZ6AP+O8aOtq8Y7L4tf5QkNSR/xBvS59wOFARZ
Tqjktob64P7bizD8+LkAq1uNcRwGQothjUC1Cou7ZZ6OgmhuowY82pmv9Zu14ofV
yroys+fecp0DLAzvuOS16d2bGzExR9LXj/tCnyMckzkDni4r+15kfCrLPsHJXlVY
rMBBZhoSXAk=
=O/7e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: