Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Peter Palfrader (weasel@debian.org) [040325 08:55]:
> > My favorite short term solution is to get sendmail fixed, option 2
> > requires all MTA packages but sendmail/rmail be changed.  What's your
> > opinion on that.
> 
> I think it's definitly too late in the release process to force all
> MTAs to add an additional virtual package.
>...

Why?

There is not even an announced date for the beginning of the freeze and 
the changes required for the MTAs are pretty simple.

> Cheers,
> Andi

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed