[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: testing migration without arm build [was: Chasen depends keep it out of 'sarge' permanently -- bug in dependency interpretation?]



On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:42:24PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> On 2004-01-11 23:14 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > The testing scripts aren't happy with chasen's dependency:
> > 
> > chasen/arm unsatisfiable Depends: ipadic (>= 2.6.3) | chasen-cannadic
> > 
> > This is a bit messed up, because chasen-cannadic *is* present in 
> > testing.
> 
> This is also the case with other packages, e. g. apache. They moved
> into testing although they weren't built on arm (but on all other
> arches); so it is very likely that this has nothing specifically to do
> with chasen.
> 
> Were these packages forced into testing because the arm autobuilder
> lags behind so badly?

For a while recently, britney ignored out-of-dateness on arm unless it
affected installability. (So, yes.)

There are currently no architectures being treated this way, but the
option's there in cases where they fall behind too badly.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: