FW: Resolved Deduction Report
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:24 PM
> To: Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Subject: RE: Resolved Deduction Report
>
> Thanks for confirming. I think we will just leave it lie unless someone
> else complains. I had just never seen these results before.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:22 PM
> To: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services;
> Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Subject: RE: Resolved Deduction Report
>
> You are correct - it is not finding any RV documents and is bypassing the
> Customer and Hierarchy read routines.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:19 PM
> To: Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services;
> Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Subject: RE: Resolved Deduction Report
>
> I've figured it out. When the only deductions that are cleared are those
> cleared through FI rather than SD then for some reason the program does
> not hit the section where name texts are brought in. This is not perfect
> but no one in the field has had an issue with it yet (it's been like this
> for over 2 years). The only time this will happen is in the first couple
> of days of the month when Unearned Cash Discounts and Ded below the ded
> tolerance are cleared. In the past months when I've run this in the first
> three days, there has always been at least one SD document which makes the
> program hit the section that pulls in names. In the perfect world, they
> wouldn't clear anything in the first couple of days (deduction activity is
> supposed to be frozen) but this never happens.
>
> At this point I don't think we need to change anything. With this report
> we can do more harm than good sometimes. We may want to look at it when
> we make adjustments with the new unauthorized deduction project.
>
> Thanks.
> Sue
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:33 AM
> To: Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services;
> Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Subject: RE: Resolved Deduction Report
>
> Fortunately or Unfortunately - nothing has changed. This is the only
> version of the program.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:06 PM
> To: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services;
> Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Subject: FW: Resolved Deduction Report
>
>
>
> Sue,
>
> We may have inadvertently caused an issue here with our change to
> the download program.
> I am assigning this program to John with top priority to implement
> the new Z_NWNA_DOWNLOAD ,
> and make sure this issue is corrected.
>
> Tom
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:15 PM
> To: Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services
> Subject: Resolved Deduction Report
>
> Tom,
>
> I'm getting output for this report that I have never seen before.
> If I run the report for Clearing Date 10/31/03. The download is fine. If
> I run the report for Clearing Dates 11/01/03-11/03/03 then the download is
> missing the partner names and hierarchy names.
>
> I've created two variants for you to look at in PRD. Run ZDEDSRPT
> with variant 10/31/03 then variant 11/01/03 and you will see the output I
> am getting. You need to delete or rename the first spreadsheet before
> running the second. You can run them in foreground if you like. They
> don't take too long.
>
> Could you please help me understand what has changed???
>
> Thanks,
> Sue
Reply to: