Re: cpu usage, consideration of others, apt-listbugs
2003年08月28日(?)の01時58分に Adam Heath wrote:
> > On IRC, I was suggested that apt-listbugs should use index.db. I had to
> > use debbugs .status file too because index.db doesn't have subject.
> >
> > apt-listbugs fetches just few static files from web server, two index
> > files and .status files of actual critical bugs. So if 5 critical
> > bugs are found, total 7 static files are downloaded. apt-listbugs
> > can be used via normal proxy servers.
>
> Requesting those files isn't itself causing load. I just don't like that the
> debbugs database is exported that way.
I agree. debbugs database is an internal format and not interface to
other programs. Actually, I wanted a released interface to access bts
other than cgi because it's slow and can't be cached easily. But
there was no fast interface to fetch bug reports. There is e-mail
interface, but it's little complex to manage database. I prefer LDAP
interface rather than e-mail interface. I'm sorry, but I'm not on
debbugs-ml. Is there any plan to implement LDAP interface? (There is
LDAP interface, but it searches debbugs dynmically and therefore slow
and no-indexing).
--
Masato Taruishi <taru@debian.org>
Reply to: