[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [proposal] subarchitectures (was: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore)



On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Michael Banck wrote:

> Also, please note that at least half of the dpkg-maintainers don't read
> -devel, you probably want to post this to -dpkg. Incidently, there is a
> proposal and patch by Gerhard Tonn for handling lib64 under
> discussion[2].

Well, considering there are most likely only 2 dpkg maintainers(of which I am
one), and I read your mail, does that mean the other isn't on this list?



Reply to: