Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge
Matt wrote:
> The ideal solution would be to be able to share tarballs between source
> packages. Then, all of the kernel-image packages could be built as if they
> had a complete kernel source tree as their source package (which simplifies
> things a lot), and yet we would only need one such tarball in the archive.
> Of course, I have little idea how much work this would be to implement,
> except that it would touch a lot of different tools.
The way I understand it was intended to work would be to have one
single kernel-source-X-Y-Z package somewhat like what we have today,
and having the various kernel-image-whatever build-depend on this
kernel-source and any necessary kernel-patch packages.
If this understanding is correct, I admit I don't see why the practice
has diverged from this idea.
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <yann.dirson@fr.alcove.com> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: