On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 21:12, Milanuk, Monte wrote: > Gag. Mail might actually be useful if Apple had had the brains to include > simple stuff like *threading* of messages. All the fluff in the world, and > the message sorting of pine. Go figure. When I got my first Mac (eMac > running 10.1.5 w/ the Jaguar disks in the box) I'd been reading all these > wonderful reviews of the various mail clients for OS X, and the authors > especially gushed about Mail.app. When I finally figured out it plain > didn't support message threading, and found out that a lot of other people > had the same gripe, I wondered, 'what in the blue blazes do these writers > actually use email for?' I guess 'normal' people don't subscribe to > mailing-lists, where threading is *essential*. As a long time Mac admin/programmer, one of the things I've noticed about a lot of Mac users is that they will gush over anything Apple does or makes. If Apple made Windows, they would love it. -- The more I use other operating systems, the more I like Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org http://www.linux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part