Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++
From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:44:18 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] E199NAI-00010r-O5@mid.downhill.at.eu.org>
Mail-followup-to: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
References: <20030425084006$16ca@gated-at.bofh.it> <[🔎] 1051321291.744.12.camel@arrakis.ens-lyon.fr> <[🔎] 20030426022158.GD26352@cheney.cx> <[🔎] 200304260507.03350.arnd@arndb.de> <[🔎] E199KJ8-0000gp-6h@mid.downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] 20030426095544.GA9087@silly.cloud.net.au>

Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:41:14AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> 1a. create a stripped down version for i386, i.e. required/important
>>     and go for i486.

> Is there much performance improvement in dropping i386 in favour of
> i486+?

I've no idea, I was arguing for splitting off i386 because it solves
the original problem.
                  cu andreas
-- 
Hey, da ist ein Ballonautomat auf der Toilette!
Unofficial _Debian-packages_ of latest unstable _tin_
http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/debian/tin-snapshot/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++
  - From: Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++
  - From: Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx>
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Request for Clue: i18n of fortune-esque things
Next by Date: Bug in apt-get ? [replace essential package / Yes, do as I say]
Previous by thread: Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++
Next by thread: Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread