"Ivan E. Moore II" <rkrusty@earthlink.net> writes: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:12:17PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: >> >> Qt is not an appropriate "teaching" package. It is too important. Give it >> up to a full time, experienced maintainer, and teach him on some other >> package. > > There are over 3 different people activly working on Qt at this point in time. > Before any packages will be uploaded all of us have to agree that everything > is correct. Then the packages will be placed up on a web site for public > testing. There will be at least 2 key packages that will be tagged for > testing. The new Qt packages will have to be installed and these packages > will have to successfully build using the new packages and run. One of > these packages will be kdelibs, and the other(s) will have to be non-KDE > applications/libraries. If any problems occur we lather/rinse/repeat. > > I think this should satisfy the requirements whether or not the actual > maintainer is newbie or not. Sounds good to me. Are there plans to create a debian-qt mailing list (since debian-kde is user-oriented) to coordinate the effort? -- My secret to happiness... is that I have a heart of a 12-year-old boy. It's over here in a jar. Would you like to see it?
Attachment:
pgpZbvaBWCN4H.pgp
Description: PGP signature