Re: Discussion - non-free software removal

[hobbes@easynet.be (Rémi Letot)]

Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> writes:

<couic>

> I also agreed to the Social Contract in its entirety.  However,
> acknowledging that our users sometimes need non-free software, does
> not automatically lead to the conclusion that continuing to add more
> non-free software to our archive is in our users' best interest.

So stop adding new non-free, but don't render access to existing used
non-free more difficult just for the sake of it. When there really are
free alternatives to every non-free, noone will use non-free, or at
least no DD will maintain it. When that comes, non-free can disappear.

-- 
Rémi