Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
> Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org> writes:
>> Personally I'd hate to see useful things like the RFC and W3
>> documentation packages go away, and it's still helpful in an advocacy
>> role to be able to point people at non-free for qmail and pine, even
>> though I'll still say "Postfix" and "mutt"(*) at them too.
> Why do you think that RFC's are non-free?
http://bugs.debian.org/92810
cu andreas