* Richard Braakman (dark@xs4all.nl) wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:39:25PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > Wow, the last thing I expected was people to have a problem with the > > name :) Well I'm open to other suggestions if necessary. I think its a > > good virtual package name in that it almost certainly won't conflict > > with any actual package's name. > > Hmm... so this is a name that a package would depend on to say "I need > an automake, it doesn't matter which". Here we have a group of packages, > all similar to the abstract idea of an automake, but somehow deformed > so that they don't fit together. Might I suggest "automakoid"? Could you explain why this is better? Is it some reference to metroid, or a matroid? -- Eric Dorland <dorland@lords.com> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgphMwS04s_1d.pgp
Description: PGP signature