> MIA maintainers are another issue that needs to be dealt with, but this > should be orthogonal. OTOH, if we don't care that a package is > maintained, then the MIA issue is moot. Is he MIA if he's not missing? The point is that just because a package is on the WNPP list as orphaned doesn't mean it's unmaintained, and just because a package isn't doesn't indicate how well it's maintained, if at all.