Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > properly. (It always seem like a lot of people get confused and they > incorrectly think that (a) proper use of Wpoison will cause the legiti- > mate search engines to avoid any web site that uses Wpoison.. which is > just plain false, and/or that (b) Wpoison will cause some innocent > people to be spammed... which is EXTREMELY unlikely.) Extremely unlikely or not, I have had at least one email address which is received by me be demonstratably generated by this kind of tool[1]. I don't know if I've received spam on it; I don't archive all my spam. But then anti-spam people have never been very concerned about collateral damage anyway. -- see shy jo [1] The @mooix.net address at http://www.cobwebsite.freewire.co.uk/antispam1.html
Attachment:
pgpBYIHvGjqLr.pgp
Description: PGP signature