Re: ITO: LILO

To: Simon Law <sfllaw@uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: Debian Devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: ITO: LILO
From: Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org>
Date: 05 Aug 2002 21:25:55 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 1028587794.15426.43.camel@runabout>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020804230846.GC5856@engmail.uwaterloo.ca>
References: <[🔎] 20020804222717.GA26956@overdue.ddts.net> <[🔎] 20020804225344.7A99E4625@lyta.coker.com.au> <[🔎] 20020804230846.GC5856@engmail.uwaterloo.ca>

On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 18:08, Simon Law wrote:

> 	Excellent...  My secret plan to deprecate LILO in favour of GNU
> GRUB is progressing wonderfully.  My other secret plan to frustrate
> people who boot RAID machines is coming along marvellously as well.
> Everything is falling in to place.

Does GRUB support something like the lilo
on-next-boot-only-boot-this-option (-R ?) feature yet?  IE: boot into
windows, but when windows reboots, boot into the default. (linux)

Without this, getting rid of LILO will be hard.

-- 
Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> http://www.ringworld.org/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ITO: LILO
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- Re: ITO: LILO
  - From: Thorsten Gunkel <tgunkel_lists@gmx.de>

References:
- lilo: bad changelog entry violates Social Contract
  - From: Lazarus Long <lazarus@overdue.ddts.net>
- ITO: LILO
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: ITO: LILO
  - From: Simon Law <sfllaw@uwaterloo.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Move to python 2.2 as default release?
Next by Date: Re: ping and inetd
Previous by thread: Re: ITO: LILO
Next by thread: Re: ITO: LILO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread