Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:28:54AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> writes:
>
> > We don't need /linux to store linux-specific files like kernel modules.
> > /lib/modules works fine, even though they are not exactly libraries.
> > Why is /hurd different?
>
> Translators are not kernel modules.
Agreed, but that doesn't change the point. Linux kernel modules
are not libraries but we store them in /lib. We don't need to
store translators in /hurd either.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: