Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:43:32PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > ...to bring in other fixes that aren't so easy to seperate from smaller
> > ones.
> >
> > Lose the tone, it wont get you what you want. Nice is being fixed. I've
> > said this in several of the bug reports. This whole thread just needs to
> > die.
>
> You haven't said it here, until now. You can't honestly expect everyone in
> the world to read all bugs, to find out what you have said in a few of them.
I can expect people who want to rant on a public list to know what the
hell that are talking about before raising a big stink. If you want to
argue about vmware breaking in libc6, go to the libc6 bug package and
search for vmware. You'll find the bug reports, and my reponses.
I'm not asking too much at all. The BTS is there for this exact reason.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: