Re: Dependencies on libpgsql2.1
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:12:12AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 02:09, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'm currently in the process of filing bugs on those packages in
> > unstable that still depend on libpgsql2.1 rather than libpgsql2, or
> > upgrading bugs to grave where they'd already been filed. Since the
> > versions in woody all appear to be fine, I'm making sure all these bugs
> > get tagged 'sid' so that they don't affect the release.
> >
> > I hope this will help the new postgresql to get into testing a little
> > more quickly.
>
> There was quite a serious upstream bug with postgresql 7.1.3: after a
> crash it was possible for sequences to go backwards. This has been
> cured in 7.2.1 and it is highly desirable that that version be in
> woody. Perhaps we should be filing RC bugs against the woody versions
> of these packages?
If the problem is in postgresql, it sounds like the most appropriate
thing to do is to file a serious bug against postgresql, tagged 'woody',
rather than adjusting the bugs on the packages using it.
I guess I (or somebody more experienced with postgresql) should start
NMUing fairly soon.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: