On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 16:48, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Wilmer van der Gaast <lintux@bigfoot.com> [2002.03.29.1432 +0100]: > > Problem is that the kernel patch is needed at compile-time already. > > Which means that all the autobuilders would need kernel source with an > > applied HTB patch, I think.. > i would argue that you could probably insert a generic 2.4.18 > sch_htb.o module into a QoS/fair-queuing enabled kernel just like > that. you want to try it? Not so. What it needs is the patched version of linux/pkt_sched.h that contains the HTB defines. The semi-NMU at http://debian.systemec.nl/ doesn't have this problem and can be built against a vanilla libc6 tree. > ftp://ftp.madduck.net/pub/linux/sch_htb.o.gz > i don't have QoS-enabled kernel without the HTB patch handy... > -- > martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) > \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck Shad -- Rens Houben | opinions are mine Resident linux guru and sysadmin | if my employers have one Systemec Internet Services. |they'll tell you themselves PGP public key at http://suzaku.systemec.nl/shadur.key.asc -- new Dec 12 2001
Attachment:
pgp3quD_gzksv.pgp
Description: PGP signature