Re: ITI: HTTPS method for apt
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 11:04:30AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 08:45:49PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Signing packages themselves is a much better approach IMHO.
>
> Agreed, but it is not yet available.
>
> Last time I tried to upload a package with a maint signature, katie
> complained loudly (or was that a coincidence? It seems my lat upload to
> non-us was silently ignored).
Wichert and I are going to start pushing package sigs post-woody. We
have the tools, we just need two things:
1) Crypto-in-main (any day now)
2) Policy
Ben
--
.----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----.
/ Ben Collins -- Debian GNU/Linux -- WatchGuard.com \
` bcollins@debian.org -- Ben.Collins@watchguard.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: