Re: Accepted efingerd 1.3.2 (i386 source)
Previously Radovan Garabik wrote:
> It is a security fix - read bug#137109, I already had(private) discussion
> with Martin Schulze about this.
As the bugreport already said that feature is pretty much the only
reason one would install efingerd, and that feature is now disabled.
It would be better if efingerd used its own user instead of nobody
but otherwise I'm not convinced we should make this change in potato.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: