Re: Bug#138541: ITP: debian-sanitize (was Re: inappropriate racist and other offensive material)
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:51, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> > Then you need separate classifications for naked women, bikini-shot
> > pictures as published in mens magazines, vogue pictures, and womens
> > clothing adverts (the best source of pr0n for young boys).
> >
> > Then there's the issue of age, are the women <16? <17? <18? <21?
> >
> > Which is worse, a picture of a naked 21yo or a 16yo wearing transperant
> > clothes in an issue of vogue?
> >
> > Which is worse, two 21yo women having sex or a 18yo masterbating?
>
> The difference: a package like this doesn't say things like "worse". It
> simply reports on content.
If we had a rating system so specific as to discriminate between the types of
content I described above then it would be a huge check-list.
But I can see one useful advantage of your scheme, people who are searching
for material that is deprecated because it offends some feeble-minded people
will have a good list to choose from! ;)
--
If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines
of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do
whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by
posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void.
Reply to: