Re: mozilla-*-cvs - is this wise?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: mozilla-*-cvs - is this wise?
- From: Takuo KITAME <kitame@northeye.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:40:46 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87heo0yemp.wl@northeye.org>
- In-reply-to: <20020228005742.GA12675@crdic.ath.cx>
- References: <20020227204548.GA332@robotattack.com> <20020227231735.GA23118@marvin.xmldesign.de> <20020228005742.GA12675@crdic.ath.cx>
>>>>> In article <20020228005742.GA12675@crdic.ath.cx>,
>>>>> "CD" == Craig Dickson <crdic@yahoo.com> wrote...:
CD> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
CD> begin Erich Schubert quotation:
CD> > > Wouldn't a tag like -current, -weekly or -unstable make more sense?
CD> >
CD> > I'd suggest -beta, like i'm going to do with galeon-beta.
CD> > (waiting in non-us incoming for inclusion)
CD> If the idea is to track the current cvs state of the product, then
CD> "beta" doesn't seem right because the product may not be in beta. You
CD> shouldn't have to change the name of the package because they happen
CD> to be in alpha, nor should you have a misleading package name.
CD> I think "-snaphot" is perhaps the best suffix.
I'll change to -snapshot. Also executable name and profile directory.
Reply to: