Re: Why does this program segfault?

[Glenn Maynard <g_deb@zewt.org>]

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:05:47AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> >The implicit copy ctor shouldn't be getting defined (there's a 
> >non-default
> >ctor), so I'm not sure exactly how that's being constructed.
> 
> If you don't want an implicit copy ctor, you have to do:
> 
> class C {
> 	...
> 	private:
> 		C(const C &);
> 
> }
> 
> and then never define that ctor. Otherwise, the compiler makes 
> one for you. Same with operator=(const C&).

My mixup was with the default ctor (suppressed if a non-default one is
declared.)

(It'd be nice if the implicit operator= and copy ctors were suppressed
if one of those or a dtor is given, though.)

-- 
Glenn Maynard