Re: omniorb debs
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:25, John Galt wrote:
> He said that it broke berlin, in a followup on that thread.
Just out of interest, how could the existence of /usr/include/CVS break
another piece of software (unless that other piece of software has a rather
unusual include path)?
Tobias wrote:
> I work on berlin, we absolutly *NEED* a useable omniorb and
> we do need python.omniorb too!".
I interpreted this to be a general complaint about the state of neglect of
omniorb (as discussed further in his original post), not an explanation of
why /usr/include/CVS specifically is breaking omniorb. In fact as far as I
could make out from his original post, his justification for severity
critical seemed to be that the bug was over a month old.
Perhaps I'm interpreting this incorrectly. Perhaps I'm not.
Ben.
--
Ben Burton
benb@acm.org | bab@debian.org
http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/
Public Key: finger bab@debian.org
The only way a woman can ever reform her husband is by boring him so
completely that he loses all possible interest in life.
- Oscar Wilde
Reply to: