On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 02:00:36PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote: > > > * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called "Apache" > > > * nor may "Apache" appear in their names without prior written > > > * permission of the Apache Group. > > > > That's no different than "Debian". You cannot endorse a product using a > > trademark without permission. That doesn't make the software non-free. > > But we do make a derivative of Apache and call it apache. I don't know if > capitalization makes any difference here, but if it doesn't then it seems to > me that we are in violation of Apache's license. This thread was covered on Deban-legal about 8 months ago. Eg, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200104/msg00049.html 'Nuf said. James -- James Bromberger <james_AT_rcpt.to> www.james.rcpt.to Australian Debian Conference: http://www.linux.org.au/conf/debiancon.html Remainder moved to http://www.james.rcpt.to/james/sig.html
Attachment:
pgpmvvC7hCc86.pgp
Description: PGP signature