Re: Why is utah-glx not in testing ?

[Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>]

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:46:11PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> > > ajt@auric:~$ madison utah-glx
> > >   utah-glx | 0.0-cvs-20000921-5 |      unstable | powerpc
> > >   utah-glx | 0.0-cvs-20001110-1 |      unstable | m68k
> > >   utah-glx | 0.0-cvs-20001213-1 |      unstable | mips
> > >   utah-glx | 0.0-cvs-20010214-1 |      unstable | source, alpha, i386
> > > The old utah-glx package, which is no longer built, but hasn't been
> > > removed from the archive. Presumably the ppc, m68k and mips packages listed
> > > above should all be removed?
> > Could that be the cause of the testing problem ?
> > If yes, I will file a bug to ftp.d.o for their removal...
> 
> It definitely is, although I'll cover all my bases and say there could
> be others too. File the bug. :)

Did that, bug #103393.

I'll come back and bug you if it does not make it :-)

Thanks,
Phil.