Re: Locking of serial devices and devfs
Previously Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> ... until one uses a lean version of devfs, which doesn't have these
> numbers, but just uses the pathname instead. Why design for a fragile system
> ? Device names aren't going away.
Using just names you loose since a single device can show up as multiple names.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: