[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#100980: ITP: crimson -- Java XML parser for JAXP1.1



Hi, Uwe!!

At Sat, 16 Jun 2001 16:04:04 +0200,
Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Please note that I maintain a package called 'crimson', which is
> in unstable already. It's a tactical game called 'Crimson Fields'...
> URL: http://www.lanipage.de/jens/crimson/
> 
> Can you choose any other name for your package which somehow fits or
> should I rename my package to crimsonfields or something?
> 
> 
> Any comments from the debian-devel people are welcome...
> 
> In case I rename my package, how should I proceed?
> 
>  * I create a new orig.tar.gz called crimsonfields
>  * The new *.deb is called crimsonfields. The debian/control Replaces:
>    and Conflicts: crimson.
>    (Should this be a versioned Replaces: and/or Conflicts:?)
>  * I upload crimsonfields and file a bug against ftp.debian.org and ask
>    for removal of crimson. (Is this really needed?)
>  * Takashi Okamoto <toraneko@kun.ne.jp> uploads a new crimson package,
>    (probably with a new epoch?)
>    (Does this package need to Replace or Conflict something?)
> 
> Is this correct? Comments and additions are welcome.

Thanks for your comment. I have been awaring it before I did ITP.

In the fact, binary package name of xml parser's crimson is
libcrimson-java that belong debian java policy. It doesn't install
anything in usr/bin. I think my crimson and Uwe's crimson doesn't
conflict. Source package name is xml-crimson that is same as
upstream's directory name. It doesn't also conflict to your package.
I give control header following:

# apt-cache show libcrimson-java
Package: libcrimson-java
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 4030
Maintainer: Takashi Okamoto <tora@debian.org>
Source: xml-crimson
Version: 1.1.20010605-1
Depends: java-common
Description: XML parser which support the Java API for XML Processing (JAXP)
 Crimson supports the Java API for XML Processing (JAXP)
 version 1.1 specification by providing implementations for the following
 package hierarchies: javax.xml.parsers, org.w3c.dom, org.xml.sax.*.

Don't worry, you don't need to change your package name, Uwe.

Regards.
----
Takashi Okamoto




Reply to: