Re: RFC: groff split (was Re: Packaging WM themes - question)
cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson) writes:
> Having slept on it and argued with myself a bit, I think it's bad that
> any and every potato system with at least the base system installed will
> end up with the X libraries on a dist-upgrade (though I imagine you
> disagree :)), so I prefer gxditview separate. What I will do is include
> the X75, X100, etc. devices in that package (since they're useless
> without gxditview anyway) and call it groff-x11; this makes it somewhat
> more worthwhile.
And FWIW, I'm going to see what's involved in creating a non-X emacs21
package. If it's not unreasonably hard, I'll probably provide one at
some point. I know this may make emacs using firewall maintainers
happier.
--
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
Reply to: