Re: Automake 2.50 migration strategy, as implemented
>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
Anthony> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Ben Collins
Anthony> wrote:
>> However, installing autoconf negates having a clean chroot for
>> the autobuilders. This means that packages with missing
>> build-deps on autoconf will succeed, even though they are
>> technically broken.
Anthony> Better to have them succeed and not bother the people
Anthony> running the autobuilders, than to fail unnecessarily.
Besides, I thought someone had written code to check access times (or
something else) on binaries in the chroot and see if extra packages
were used. I certainly got at least one bug filed on a build that
succeeded for incorrect build-deps with what appeared to be automated
output pointing out I used debhelper.
Reply to: