[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path



On Fri, 25 May 2001, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> here.)  Is the alternative of simply filing a bug on *every*
> package that Build-Depends: on autoconf acceptable?

No. However, if you could provide us with a list of all packages that:
1) build-depends on autoconf
or
2) do not have a build-depends header AND have a configure.in file

We could have a good idea of which packages really need to be manually
checked.  I fear there are many.

You can use the contents files to track down the configure.in files. As for
a machine with good connectivity for what you need, why don't you ssh to
klecker.d.o or auric.d.o and do the work from there?

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Attachment: pgpAs_V1TgK4U.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: