Re: rfc1149

To: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Cc: Sam Couter <sam@topic.com.au>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rfc1149
From: Hilko Bengen <bengen@vdst-ka.inka.de>
Date: 07 May 2001 18:09:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ae4pjg36.fsf@ataraxia.vdst-ka.inka.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 8766fgn1v8.fsf@becket.becket.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.32.0105021818020.14114-100000@jyoti.braincells.com> <[🔎] 87wv7zjl2h.fsf@priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <[🔎] 20010503170406.C10885@topic.com.au> <[🔎] 8766fgn1v8.fsf@becket.becket.net>

tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:

> No, no. Pigeons are ugly horrid things that infest cities and leave
> droppings on my car.

You mean packet loss?

-Hilko

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rfc1149
  - From: Andreas Fuchs <asf@acm.org>
- Re: rfc1149
  - From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>

References:
- Re: rfc1149
  - From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@debian.org>
- Re: rfc1149
  - From: Evan Prodromou <evan@debian.org>
- Re: rfc1149
  - From: Sam Couter <sam@topic.com.au>
- Re: rfc1149
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

Prev by Date: Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)
Next by Date: Re: build depends on kernel-headers
Previous by thread: Re: rfc1149
Next by thread: Re: rfc1149
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread