Re: Bug#96102: ITP: serpento -- dictd server written in python

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#96102: ITP: serpento -- dictd server written in python
From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
Date: 04 May 2001 09:19:29 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bsp9zim6.fsf@arabella.intern.opera.no>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010503213857.A10801@melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk>
References: <[🔎] 20010502210429.A32277@melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk> <[🔎] 20010503004235.E24564@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20010503213857.A10801@melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk>

* Radovan Garabik 

| > Can it be run from inetd? I'm really dying for a dict server that can be
| 
| More or less, yes, it can, but currently it is a bit unusable
| since it takes forever to start (it has to parse the index file(s),
| and parsing is written in python - rewritting it in C is on my TODO list)

Why not just using cPickle and smart caching?  It's pretty fast, ime.

-- 

Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#96102: ITP: serpento -- dictd server written in python
  - From: Radovan Garabik <garabik@melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk>

References:
- ITP: serpento -- dictd server written in python
  - From: Radovan Garabik <garabik@melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk>
- Re: Bug#96102: ITP: serpento -- dictd server written in python
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#96102: ITP: serpento -- dictd server written in python
  - From: Radovan Garabik <garabik@melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk>

Prev by Date: taking over unixodbc
Next by Date: Re: rfc1149
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#96102: ITP: serpento -- dictd server written in python
Next by thread: Re: Bug#96102: ITP: serpento -- dictd server written in python
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread