Re: [WARNING] hold off all i386 uploads against libc6-dev 2.2.2-3 or 2.2.2-4!
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 08:34:38AM -0800, Ian Eure wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Because of a bug in binutils, shared libraries compiled against the
> > above two versions of binutils will cause failures to link against them.
> > Either downgrade to libc6/libc6-dev from testing (2.2.2-2 I think), or
> > don't upload any builds against these until a new binutils/libc6 is
> > uploaded.
> >
> i'm seeing some odd behavior with glibc 2.2.2-2 in unstable (2.2.2-1 is in
> testing).
>
> when i compile a program that uses fnmatch(), (e.g. bash) i get errors
> about symbol GLIBC_2.2.3 not found when trying to run it with glibc 2.2.2
> compiled by hand.
>
> downgrading to 2.2.2-1 from testing and recompiling the programs that were
> linked against 2.2.2-2 solved it for me.
Obviously. Which is why libc6 2.2.2-2 has an shlib dep for "libc6 (>=
2.2.2-2)". Note that (as you can see from the changelog) that right now
our glibc is following CVS. CVS is in a flux inbetween 2.2.2 and 2.2.3.
If you want pure 2.2.2, then use 2.2.2-1. Almost everything that isn't
-1 is a CVS patchup.
Ben
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: