Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections

To: "Eray Ozkural \(exa\)" <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Cc: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
From: Anand Kumria <wildfire@progsoc.uts.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 13:53:29 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20001226135328.I24072@ftoomsh.progsoc.uts.edu.au>
Reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3A480282.F8D604CC@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>; from erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr on Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:29:22AM +0200
References: <87g0lss2bu.fsf@becket.becket.net> <39F0AD64.98E2D14E@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <87pukvmeey.fsf@becket.becket.net> <39F0E896.3F2B0F2F@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <878zrjm2s8.fsf@becket.becket.net> <39F0FC56.32C334EC@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <87r95alnrh.fsf@becket.becket.net> <39F2841A.956F3602@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <878zrgk3xf.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 3A480282.F8D604CC@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>

On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:29:22AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 

[snip - lengthy email]

All of which is fine and dandy. None of which belonged on a public
mailing list though. Your email is tangentially related to Debians'
effort to determine new categories. 

In future please send those kinds of emails privately.

Anand

-- 
Linux.Conf.Au			--		http://linux.conf.au/
17th - 20th January, 		--		Alan Cox, David Miller,
Sydney, Australia 		--		Tridge, maddog and you?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
  - From: "Eray Ozkural \(exa\)" <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>

References:
- Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
  - From: "Eray Ozkural \(exa\)" <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user
Next by Date: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
Previous by thread: Oops
Next by thread: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread