Re: Bug#65256: devscripts: master.procmail example has no loop checking

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

Julian Gilbey:
> [...] So would the following work, in place of the
> existing two lines (which are:
> :0
> ! $FORWARD
> ), and have the same effect, minus the looping?
>
> :0
> * !^FROM_DAEMON
> * !^X-Loop: $FORWARD
> | formail -A"X-Loop: $FORWARD" | $SENDMAIL $FORWARD

I would use $SENDMAIL -oi $FORWARD here.

[ The change your@own.mail.address -> $FORWARD for the X-Loop header
should be harmless but I am not 100% sure ].