Re: kernel with supermount
> Previously Joseph Carter wrote:
>> However, I must agree that more or less every major distribution except us
>> supplies a rather heavily patched kernel. In truth, the reason not to
>> patch our kernel is more in that maintaining our patches is a PITA with
>> the current source packages and that dbs is no substitute for a modern
>> source package format. =p
FWIW, my policy is to minimise the amount of new features, while including
any bug fixes which are necessary. Oh, and CVS (which I use for all my
packages) has no problems dealing with a large amount of patches.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: