Re: dpkg-statoverride vs. suidmanager
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 04:44:11PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > do you mean that if a setuid binary as to be managed with suidmanager
> > it must go in .deb without the setuid (becouse that little window upon
> > deflating the .deb in which it is setuid even if it shouldn't)? if it
> > would be managed by dpkg-statoverride it can be whatever mod you want?
>
> Exactly.
This seems to mean we get a pre-dependency on the new dpkg in every package
moving to statoverride.
Marcus
Reply to: