Re: DB3 symbol collisions solved...
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 02:15:43PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > > Er, no he isn't. Look at what he has done and look at the result. He made
> > > a program just like slapd that is linked to db3 but is really using db2
> > > when sasl is involved. He has proved this by the simple fact that the
> > > db_version symbol gets linked to db2 in his test program in the presense
> > > of sasl.
>
> > Damn, I didn't look close enough at his test. This very much sucks. The
> > odd thing is that slapd actually does use the db3 symbols. It would surely
> > crash otherwise, considering it uses things only found in db3. Plus the
> > fact that I inserted a db_version call into slapd to test it.
>
> > Ben...whois is checking this out some more...
>
> Ben,
>
> Didn't you say that you managed this trick by modifying the header files?
> Herbert mentioned that he had not installed db3-devel -- he was still using
> the headers from db2, instead...
No, I produced a header that I used to trick the build, but it doesn't
affect db.h
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: