Re: More things about the toolchain: ldconfig doesn't create libf oo.s o links anymore?

To: "'debian-devel@lists.debian.org'" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: More things about the toolchain: ldconfig doesn't create libf oo.s o links anymore?
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 22:29:18 -0500
Message-id: <20001015222918.D872@deadbeast.net>
Mail-followup-to: "'debian-devel@lists.debian.org'" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010130313400.9588-100000@mailtrans.sote.hu>; from ice@extreme.hu on Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 03:14:15AM +0200
References: <20001012200415.A19331@drow.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010130313400.9588-100000@mailtrans.sote.hu>

On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 03:14:15AM +0200, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> the .so belongs to the lib package.

Wrong.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |
Debian GNU/Linux                |   If God had intended for man to go about
branden@debian.org              |   naked, we would have been born that way.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpSf7vHUYh34.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: More things about the toolchain: ldconfig doesn't create libf oo.s o links anymore?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Re: More things about the toolchain: ldconfig doesn't create libf oo.s o links anymore?
  - From: Tamas TEVESZ <ice@extreme.hu>

Prev by Date: ITP: memtest86
Next by Date: Re: ITP: memtest86
Previous by thread: Re: More things about the toolchain: ldconfig doesn't create libf oo.s o links anymore?
Next by thread: Re: More things about the toolchain: ldconfig doesn't create libf oo.s o links anymore?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread