Re: kernel-image and epoch
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 03:07:59PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 02:59:01AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > considering each kernel version is a different package it seems that
> > it should be quite easy to fix, 2.2.18 need not have any epochs, no?
>
> No! Once you start with an epoch you are forced to keep it forever because
> 1:2.2.17 > 2.2.18.
You missed the point. kernel-image-2.2.17_1:2.2.17 has no relationship
to kernel-image-2.2.18_2.2.18
--
Mike Stone
Reply to: