On Jul 24, Paul Seelig wrote: > This here presents IMHO a good argument for shipping a distribution > with software versions which are not considered obsolete by it's > upstream maintainers. Or for shipping it without any version of GNOME whatsoever. Actually, maybe that would be a good idea, since it'd at least shut up the KDE people who think we're on some sort of anti-KDE, pro-GNOME crusade. Chris, joking (maybe)