Re: GFDL GR, vote please!
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:22:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I guess I could:
>
> - ignore that the Project seems to have gone insane and issued a
> position statement that I can't grok, and continue treating GFDL works as
> RC for etch
> - ignore the Project Secretary's interpretation that this amendment
> implicitly modifies the DFSG, and continue treating GFDL works as RC for
> etch
> - accept that I don't understand how the Project as a whole interprets the
> DFSG, and defer to either the Technical Committee or the FTP Team
> regarding the RC-ness of all licensing bugs
> - start a new GR
> - resign and let somebody else deal with it
> - have an existential crisis
I vote for the latter. It results in the least number of problems for
all of us. Well, except you ;-)
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4
Reply to: