Re: Clarification about krooger's platform
- To: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:37:25 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87sm3bs46i.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca>
- References: <20050303031045.GA4776@double-helix.org> <20050303060359.GA15727@reactor-core.org> <20050303062804.GL12914@hezmatt.org> <20050303064719.GA24945@reactor-core.org> <20050303070735.GC14576@hezmatt.org> <20050303071911.GA29376@reactor-core.org> <20050303124651.GA1724@eclipse.debian.net> <4227460d$0$10953$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com> <20050303221158.GA23780@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
Steve> Do most developers do anything for the project, or do they just
Steve> contribute to useless flamewars? (Seriously, I've seen a bit
Steve> more from looking at the BTS and upload statistics, but the
Steve> flamewars are the most visible act so far.)
Isn't that part of the T&S test in the New Maintainer process: "Start a
flamewar on one of the Debian mailing lists."?
--
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
Reply to: