Re: Picking a new member - process

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Don Armstrong writes ("Re: Picking a new member - process"):
> If the way each member voted were obscured, I wouldn't have a problem
> with a public vote. However, since actually obscuring votes is difficult
> when there are so few voters, I'm not sure how that would be handled.

Constitution 6.3(4) says the votes should be public.

Obviously we could subvert this by having a pre-vote on the -private
list to select a single candidate to publicly vote to put forward to
the DPL but that hardly seems like following the spirit of the
constitution.

Ian.