Re: Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to CELT codec library removal
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 09:18:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to
CELT codec library removal"):
> > If there was time before the freeze I would have wanted to handle
> > this differently
[…]
> > If Mumble is the only package that requires celt 0.7
> > then it would have been nice to embed it internally and remove the
> > libcelt library to end its proliferation.
>
> Right. But I don't think we want to do restructuring like that at
> this point.
Yes I understand that. ;-)
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 08:03:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to
CELT codec library removal"):
> > Additionally if we plan to re-introduce the CELT library,
> > maintainers that had packages using CELT need contacting if an
> > opportunity is to be given for those packages to be [un]patched to
> > re-add CELT support again desired.
>
> Which _other_ packages besides mumble are we thinking of here ?
I examined libcelt0-0 reverse depends but I think the potential candidates are
listed in Ron's initial post to Bug #674634 (which strangely is message #5):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674634
roaraudio seems to have been the package most impacted.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle@coredump.us
Reply to: