Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes: > The question at issue in these bugs is whether it is permissible for > a package in main to declare a non-default alternative dependency on > a package in non-free. In other words, may a package in main have a > dependency of: > > Depends: foo | foo-nonfree Yes, of course this is allowed. The standard we expect packages in main to uphold is that they are functional and useful without requiring any software from outside of main. The above construction completely satisfies that standard. With respect to sequencing, my expectation is that all options in main should be listed before any options that are not in main. Bdale
Attachment:
pgpoUeN0JpKJw.pgp
Description: PGP signature