[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CI failing due to missing dependency?



Hi Sascha,

On 21-04-2024 6:24 p.m., Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
I am currently wondering why the testing autopkgtests for suricata are
failing [0] due to a missing dependency on libssl3 (= 3.1.5-1) via
libssl-dev. That libssl3 version exists in testing [1, 2] but not in
unstable (likely because of the t64 transition?). I would expect this
testing test to use the testing version of the library though, right?

The time_t transition is stretching the upgrade capabilities beyond what apt is able to handle in a lot of cases.

Any ideas? Thanks in advance for any pointers.

The test passes in unstable. So if you're not in a hurry, I would just sit out the time_t transition. It's not worth your time to figure out how to work around it. Our testing migration setup used for autopkgtest just isn't working in a lot of time_t related scenarios.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: